The C•CUBE Ecosystem Conversations Challenge
What is the C•CUBE Ecosystem Conversations Challenge?
The Challenge is a structured toolkit participation activity that invites you and your ecosystem partners to engage in a couple of ecosystem-building conversations using conversation guides and other resources from the toolkit.
Successful completion of the Challenge includes completing all items on the Participation Checklist. Participating institutions/organizations should download this checklist and use it to guide activities during the challenge.
Why should my institution or organization participate in the Challenge?
By participating in the Challenge, you will:
- Get structured guidance for leveraging C•CUBE tools for ecosystem building with your key stakeholders and partners.
- Learn from other institutions and organizations new strategies for ecosystem building.
- Be able to assess the toolkit for ongoing work focused on building partnerships and collaboration across your ecosystem.
- Gain access to a number of rewards—see participation rewards below.
Participation Rewards:
We are working with partners to make a variety of rewards available to institutions and organizations that sign up and successfully complete the Challenge (see participation checklist below).
- Exclusive Webinar—Funding and Sustaining Ecosystem Building Activities: We are working on an exclusive webinar for next spring. Attendance will only be available to those institutions and organizations that successfully complete the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge.
- Limited Edition Lapel Pins: We’ll send a handful of our limited edition C•CUBE lapel pins to institutions and organizations that complete the Challenge, for distribution among key partners.
Additional Rewards for Members of Our Partner Organizations
Members of our partner organizations that successfully complete the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge will receive additional rewards from these organizations. (If you or your organization are members of more than one of these, select it below.)
Choose an Organization Below
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU)
APLU participants who complete all items on the participation checklist will receive the following reward from APLU:
- Successfully completing members will be entered into a drawing for two complimentary registrations for APLU’s Commission on Community and Economic Engagement (CECE) 2024 Summer Meeting.
International Business Innovation Association (InBIA)
InBIA participants who complete all items on the participation checklist will receive:
- Drawing for 50% Off 2024 Ecosystem Builders Forum Regular Registration Rates
All InBIA members who complete the challenge will be entered into a raffle to win one of two half-off tickets to the Ecosystem Builders Forum, to be held October 22 to 24 in Kansas City. The e.Builders Forum highlights best practices in ecosystem building and provides tools and resources practitioners can implement immediately to improve their centers and the broader networks in which they operate. - Spotlight Guest Blog
Five challenge participants will have the opportunity to work with InBIA on a guest blog highlighting their programs. These blogs will be widely distributed through InBIA’s social media and other communication channels. These opportunities will be awarded on a first-come, first-served basis to members who complete the challenge.
National Association for Community College Entrepreneurship:
NACCE participants who complete all items on the checklist will be eligible to receive one or more of these rewards from NACCE (note that not all rewards will be available to everyone who completes—some will be made available through a drawing—a final list of NACCE rewards will be available in January):
- NACCE gift bag (a collection of NACCE imprinted promotional items)
- Free registration for a future NACCE Summit
- Visibility for the ecosystem work in a session at the 2024 national conference
- Recognition in the NACCE Community College Entrepreneurship journal
- Featured on a NACCE’s Forward with NACCE podcast
United State Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE):
USASBE participants who complete all items on the participation checklist will receive additional rewards from USASBE. A list of rewards will be available soon.
University Economic Development Association (UEDA):
UEDA participants who complete all items on the checklist will receive one or more of these benefits from UEDA, to be distributed based on the number of successfully completing members:
- A spotlight webinar or webinar series highlighting participating/completing organizations
- A spotlight session at the UEDA Annual Summit next year
- Visibility for the ecosystem work in the UEDA Intersection newsletter
Additional Information
LinkedIn Group
Pre-Challenge Sessions
- Thursday, October 12, 4pm Eastern Time
Topic: Building the Internal Ecosystem in Your Organization
Watch the replay.
Read the chat transcript. - Thursday, October 26, 4pm Eastern Time
Topic: Connecting Entrepreneurship, Economic Development, and Community Development
Watch the replay.
Read the chat transcript. - Thursday, November 9, 4pm Eastern Time
Topic: Whom to Include in Ecosystem Conversations
Watch the replay.
Read the chat transcript. - Thursday, November 30, 4pm Eastern Time
Topic: Conversation Formats and Technology Tools
Watch the replay.
Read the chat transcript. - Thursday, December 14, 4pm Eastern Time
Topic: What Does Ecosystem Success Look Like
Watch the replay.
Read the chat transcript.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
General Questions
What is the main goal of the C•CUBE Toolkit?
The C•CUBE Toolkit is designed to facilitate effective ecosystem-building conversations. It provides structured guides and resources to help participants understand their roles in ecosystem building and develop strategies for collaboration and engagement.
Our institution hasn't really been very actively engaged in ecosystem building in our community. How do we get started without stepping on toes in the community?
To start engaging in ecosystem building without stepping on toes, it’s crucial to approach the community with a mindset of listening and learning. It’s about showing up and being cognizant about how you show up, with an eye to building collaboration and trust. Understand the existing landscape and key players. Reach out to these stakeholders for informal discussions to gain insights into their needs and perspectives. Ensure that your institution’s involvement adds value and complements existing efforts. Transparency, open communication, and a collaborative attitude are key. It’s also often beneficial to start with small, non-intrusive initiatives to demonstrate commitment and gradually build trust and relationships.
Brian Enevoldsen, from the WT Enterprise Center at West Texas A&M University, shared that when his Center started to engage with the ecosystem, they reached out and invited area ecosystem support organizations to come for a luncheon and simply share what programs and services they offer, noting that the Center would like to be more knowledgeable so that they can refer entrepreneurs and others to the right resources in an informed way. This approach of reaching out and convening so that the university can better “lift up” the work of other organizations is a great example of how to take the first steps of engaging. Additional background on the ‘about’ page of this site has useful background in getting started in ecosystem building.
The toolkit is centered around colleges and universities. Will it be helpful to other kinds of organizations to make use of the toolkit and these conversation guides?
Yes, although it is centered around colleges and universities, the toolkit can be beneficial to other organizations involved in ecosystem building. Its principles and conversation guides are adaptable and can be applied to various contexts, including non-profits, government agencies, and private sector entities. Such organizations can use the toolkit to facilitate collaborative discussions, mesh their goals with those of the educational institutions, where appropriate, and contribute effectively to the broader ecosystem. The inclusive and flexible nature of the toolkit’s design allows for a wide range of applications beyond academia. For any organization making use of the toolkit and its conversation guides, consider these key questions:
“What role should we be playing here?”
“What role are we playing currently?”
“What do we need to advance the entrepreneurial ecosystem collaboratively?”
“How will these conversations and resources help us to refine our understanding about the roles we should be playing?
“How will these resources shed light on the roles of other organizations?”
“How will these resources help shape collaborative activities within the context of these roles?”
How do we get started working with others in our region, contributing to the ecosystem without creating a sense of competition?
To start working with others in your region without creating competition, focus on collaboration and shared goals. Begin by identifying common objectives and challenges within the ecosystem. Engage in open dialogues to understand each organization’s strengths and areas of expertise. Emphasize the benefits of collaboration, such as pooled resources and combined efforts, to address common issues. Building trust through transparency and clear communication is key. Seek to create win-win scenarios where all parties can benefit from the collaboration, thereby reducing the sense of competition.
As Mary Jove of Alvin Community College shared, from a breakout discussion at one of our drop-in office hours sessions, ecosystem building is like building a house. There’s a need for, and room for, all kinds of assets and contributions—when you build a house, you need carpenters, an electrician, a plumber, painters, etc. Ecosystems are the same—lots of different contributions will be needed and there’s no need for organizations to compete.
How do I overcome the inherent challenges (lack of shared definitions, different cultures, or misaligned goals, for example) of bringing people and organizations together from across economic development, community development, workforce development, and entrepreneurship?
To overcome challenges in uniting varied stakeholders from economic development, community development, workforce development, and entrepreneurship, start by establishing common ground and shared objectives. Emphasize the overarching goal of regional development and how each sector contributes. Facilitate open dialogues to understand differing perspectives and cultures. Aligning goals may require compromise and flexibility. Encourage participants to see the value in different approaches and foster a culture of mutual respect. Regular communication and small-scale collaborative projects can build trust and understanding, leading to more substantial collaborations. The C•CUBE conversation guides are a great way of simply greasing the collaborative gears and helping organizations coming from different perspectives to simply start sharing those perspectives.
How does the toolkit align with the work of the partner organizations (APLU, InBIA, NACCE, UEDA, USASBE)? I want to make sure that we are undertaking work that is in alignment with those organizations that we are a member of.
The toolkit aligns with the work of partner organizations including APLU, InBIA, NACCE, UEDA, and USASBE by emphasizing engagement with internal and external stakeholders, collaborative ecosystem building, innovation, and entrepreneurial development, which are core focuses of these organizations. It supports the shared goals of fostering entrepreneurship and engaging educational institutions in broader economic and community development. By using this toolkit, you’re undertaking work that complements the missions of these organizations, ensuring alignment with their objectives and your membership commitments.
What will happen to this toolkit after the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge ends next spring?
After the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge ends next spring, the toolkit will continue to be a valuable resource for institutions and organizations involved in ecosystem building. It may be updated based on feedback from the Challenge, enhancing its usefulness. The toolkit could also serve as a foundational document for future initiatives and programs related to entrepreneurial ecosystem building. Participating institutions and organizations will continue to have access to and benefit from the toolkit for ongoing development and collaboration efforts.
The partner organizations we’ve worked with—APLU, InBIA, NACCE, UEDA, and USASBE—will be working on strategies for highlighting the toolkit as a useful resource for member institutions. Be sure to reach out to your contacts at these organizations to find out more about the ways they will continue to advance the toolkit.
Toolkit development partners Venn Collaborative and the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh will also continue to develop offerings to support institutions and organizations in using the toolkit. Watch for more information about these offerings via email.
How can I get help with using the toolkit and/or planning, working with any of the conversation guides?
Please don’t hesitate to reach out via email, anytime. When reaching out, please email all three of the C•CUBE team leaders so that we can make sure you get a timely response:
Dr. Jim Woodell | Venn Collaborative | jim@venncollaborative.org
Arthur Smith | Venn Collaborative | arthur@venncollaborative.org
Dr. John Muraski | University of Wisconsin Oshkosh | muraskij@uwosh.edu
Also, please make liberal use of the C•CUBE LinkedIn group to share ideas with colleagues, and to ask for help! Many of your colleagues are likely facing the same challenges you are, and may have discovered solutions!
Questions Specific to the Conversation Challenge
Who should participate in the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge?
Representatives from higher education institutions, including, but not limited to, faculty and staff engaged in entrepreneurship ecosystem building, as well as their partners like entrepreneurs, support organizations, and economic development entities, are encouraged to participate.
What are some key conversation formats used in the conversation guides?
The toolkit conversation guides utilize various conversation formats like 2×2 frameworks, World Café, and design thinking approaches, and others, adapting to different contexts for effective dialogue and brainstorming.
What support is provided during the Ecosystem Conversations Challenge?
Participants in the Challenge receive structured guidance, learn new strategies, and can assess the toolkit’s effectiveness in their ongoing work. Rewards and exclusive webinars are also offered. See information above.
What's the best way to get familiar with the topics and conversation guides included in the toolkit?
The best way to familiarize yourself with the topics and conversation guides in the toolkit is to actively engage with its contents. Start by reading about the toolkit’s structure and overview in this article: A Framework for Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Building in Higher Education Contexts. In this overview, we provide a broad understanding of the toolkit goals and methodology. Then, explore the Tools page, delving into specific topics and conversation guides one by one, focusing on their objectives, structure, and the suggested activities. The key is simply to look for things that prompt you to think “that sounds like what we need right now in our ecosystem…” We recommend that you discuss your observations about these topics with others. Working in small groups with colleagues can help in gaining a deeper understanding and ideas about how the content relates to your institution/organization and ecosystem, and which tools would be most useful in advancing your ecosystem building work now.
Whom should I be inviting to participate in ecosystem conversations? Are some organizations more important to include than others? Are there individuals or organizations that are more likely to be willing to participate than others? How do I make sure that traditionally underestimated communities and voices are represented?
When inviting participants for ecosystem conversations, aim for a diverse and inclusive group. Include a range of organizations such as local businesses, non-profits, government agencies, and community groups. Although all organizations are important, prioritize those directly impacting or impacted by the ecosystem. Seek out individuals who have shown interest in community engagement and collaboration. To ensure representation from traditionally underestimated communities, actively reach out to leaders and groups within these communities, offering them prominent roles in the discussions, and also offering compensation for time and expertise wherever possible. It’s crucial to create an environment where all voices are valued and heard. Some specific types of organizations to consider: chambers of commerce, incubators and accelerators, small business development centers, philanthropic organizations, venture development organizations, economic development agencies and organizations, faith-based institutions, affinity-based entrepreneurial groups, for instance female entrepreneurs. Inclusion also means businesses of all sizes, from large traded sector companies to small main street shops.
Often, a “y’all come” approach can be very helpful at the beginning stages because you want to have as diverse as possible a set of perspectives, ideas, and potential resources; and don’t forget to ask the people you are convening who should be included and if they are aware of missing voices.
How should we approach selecting the toolkit-defined topics and conversation guides we focus on for the Challenge? Which of the 12 topics or 36 conversation guides should we start with?
To select topics and conversation guides from the toolkit for the Challenge, start by evaluating the specific needs and priorities of your ecosystem. Consider factors like the current state of the ecosystem, prevalent challenges, and the goals of the participants. It might be helpful to begin with topics that are broadly relevant or address pressing issues in your community. We recommend you engage stakeholders in a preliminary discussion to gauge interest and relevance. The decision on which of the 12 topics or 36 conversation guides to start with is best made with collective input, in that way ensuring that the chosen topics are aligned with the most immediate and impactful areas of focus for your ecosystem all the participants will see potential value in the work.
Are we expected to progress from one point in the framework to another as part of our participation in the Challenge? Should we be following toolkit-defined topics in some sort of order?
Entrepreneurial ecosystem building is not a linear process! And the framework should not be considered as a sequential way of working. It’s likely that your work will be spread across multiple stages and themes. Accordingly, participation in the Challenge doesn’t require any linear progression through the framework topics. Instead, focus on the topics most relevant to your ecosystem’s current needs and goals, and the best sequence to work on this in your context. The toolkit is flexible, allowing you to choose conversation guides that best fit your objectives. This approach ensures that your engagement in the Challenge is both impactful and tailored to the unique dynamics of your ecosystem.
We have tried to craft an experience with this toolkit that allows you to “choose your own adventure.” Start wherever it makes sense to you and your ecosystem partners, and proceed in whatever way seems most helpful.
When planning and conducting any of the conversations, how closely should we be sticking to the conversation guide?Your Title Goes Here
When using the conversation guide for planning and conducting conversations, it’s important to use it as a flexible framework rather than a strict script. The guide is designed to provide structure and direction, but adapting it to the specific context, culture, and dynamics of your group is crucial. Focus on the objectives of the guide while allowing for organic discussion and input from participants. This approach ensures that the conversation remains relevant and engaging for all involved.
What if I don't feel that we have not yet built the ecosystem within my college or university? Is it okay to focus conversations just on internal stakeholders at first?
Yes, it’s absolutely okay to initially focus conversations on internal stakeholders within your college or university. Building a strong internal ecosystem is a crucial step before engaging effectively with external stakeholders. These internal discussions can help in understanding the existing dynamics, identifying areas for improvement, and building a cohesive approach towards ecosystem building. Establishing a clear internal strategy, and alignment across the institution, will improve the chances of effective and impactful collaboration with external partners and stakeholders. Consider what it might mean to “Be the ecosystem you wish to see in the world…”(To adapt a famous quotation about change.) If your institution/organization wants to be an effective partner in the ecosystem, it must first be an effective ecosystem itself. This conversation guide can help with this work.
Should I include other institutions of higher education in the region in these conversations? The institutions are often competing with one another, but we also have overlapping interests in the entrepreneurship ecosystem, and we all have different assets to contribute. How should I proceed in engaging them?
Including other higher education institutions in the region can be beneficial, despite potential competition. Focus on common goals in the entrepreneurship ecosystem and emphasize the unique assets that each institution brings. Start with open dialogues to build trust and explore areas of mutual interest. Acknowledge competitive aspects but steer conversations towards collaborative opportunities, shared challenges, and regional benefits. Gradual engagement, starting with less competitive areas, can lay the foundation for broader collaboration. This conversation guide can help with this work.
Matthew Gilbert, from MRG & Associates, an ecosystem building partner with University of Northern Iowa, suggests that engaging state-level coordinating bodies, like boards of regents or statewide associations, can be a very helpful way of getting the conversation going between multiple and varied institutions of higher education.
How can I connect with other institutions/organizations participating in the Challenge?
Connect with others participating in the Challenge by visiting the C•CUBE LinkedIn group. We will also work on making a directory of participants available, with the option for participants to share their email address or other contact information.
What do I need to do to participate in and successfully complete the Challenge?
What do I need to do to participate in and successfully complete the Challenge?
To participate in and successfully complete the Challenge, you need to sign up by December 18. Then you will undertake a variety of other activities, including engaging your ecosystem partners in conversations. A Participation Checklist of items you need to complete is available here.
What formats will work best for these conversations? Virtual? Face-to-face? Traditional meetings? Workshops?
The best format for these conversations depends on the specific context and goals. Virtual meetings offer convenience and wider accessibility, especially for geographically dispersed participants. Face-to-face meetings, on the other hand, are effective for building deeper connections and more engaged discussions. Traditional meetings are suitable for formal discussions and decision-making, while workshops can be more interactive and hands-on, ideal for brainstorming and collaborative problem-solving. The choice of format should align with the objectives of the conversation, the preferences of the participants, and the logistical possibilities.
You will need to adapt the conversation guides to the formats and tools that will work best with your organization and your ecosystem partners. Importantly, consider how you can undertake your conversations to maximize participation, especially by those who might face challenges like the need for child care, or travel reimbursement.
What kinds of organizations and individuals should we be including in these conversations?
We recommend that you include a diverse range of organizations and individuals such as local businesses, educational institutions, government agencies, non-profits, community leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, and representatives from various sectors like technology, healthcare, hospitality, recreation, tourism, and the arts, etc. Ensure representation from different demographic groups and sectors to gain a comprehensive perspective. Engaging a mix of decision-makers and those directly affected by ecosystem changes is crucial for effective and inclusive discussions. And don’t neglect including the entrepreneurial voice.
How can I convince my colleagues and partners that participation in the Challenge is worthwhile? What benefits will we get from using the toolkit and/or participation in the Challenge?
To convince your colleagues and partners, highlight that participation in the Challenge offers structured guidance for ecosystem building, fosters collaboration, and enhances learning about new strategies. It’s an opportunity to assess and refine approaches to ecosystem engagement. Additionally, the toolkit provides adaptable resources to address specific ecosystem challenges. Participants can gain insights from other institutions, access to exclusive webinars, and recognition through rewards like limited edition lapel pins. Participation underscores commitment to collaborative growth and community development.
For more details, visit the C•CUBE Ecosystem Conversations Challenge webpage.
Are there additional quetions you have? Please use this form to let us know and we’ll add them to the FAQ.